Section 79 of the Income Tax Act definitely needs to be amended!

Was again faced with a situation where another client incurred the wrath of Section 79 and is loosing the right to carry forward substantial genuine business losses just on account of taking on a new (majority) shareholder.

Till 1989, before clause (b) was deleted from Section 79, there was the possibility for a genuine loss making company to take on a majority partner/ shareholder and still claim set off of losses in subsequent years so as to mitigate some of the hardship suffered earlier. The object of clause (b) was to ensure that the assessee was not deprived of the benefit of carry forward of losses unless the change in shareholding had been made with a view to avoid or reduce the tax liability. However, as the section stands to day, there is no discretionary power in the hands of the assessing officer to do anything in the matter and in all cases where there is a 51% or greater transfer of beneficial shareholding the right to carry forward and set-off previous years’ genuine losses is lost. This is downright unfair, and hard, on genuine entrepreneurs who have, firstly, lost a lot of their money in the venture and have to now doubly suffer on account of this stricture of law.

It just goes to show the lack of trust that the government has in its own administrative machinery and instead of trying to plug the loopholes for the misuse of Section 79, it has simply taken the easy way out and done away with the discretionary powers given to its officers, in the process putting all genuine business owners at loss. Looking at it in the context of the overall direct tax collection of the government, I don’t think this kind of set off would have had any material impact on the same, however, from the company’s point of view the impact is huge on each such company that is put to a genuine hardship (loss) on this account.