India’s Corporate lawyers court riches

Well, I guess my last post on the topic of CAs and lawyers having a good time despite a slowdown in the economy and some job losses across the board today got support from an article in the FT which goes on to say -

While the world economy sags, India’s lawyers are enjoying a boom. Lead partners at the country’s commercial law firms are now earning over $1m a year.

“Corporate [lawyer] salaries have ex ploded. They are going up by 20 to 40 per cent,” says Anand Prasad, a partner at Trilegal, a law firm with offices in Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore.

With rates for domestic corporate lawyers averaging $400 an hour, even junior corporate partners at top firms earn surprising sums – sometimes up to $250,000 before bonus es. Desai & Diwanji, for example, a firm with offices in Mumbai and Delhi, increased its staff remuneration this year by 200 per cent.

While liberalisation of the Indian economy began only in 1991 – making the modern practice of corporate law in India just 15 years old – the profession is already reaping huge benefits from a period of economic growth that will be slowed, but is unlikely to be halted, by the global downturn.

The shift has some painful ramifications, both for foreign law firms prevented from sharing in the bonanza locally by protectionist regulation and large corporations that are unable to use a single international law firm for all their work.

Global law firms such as Clifford Chance see India as ripe with possibility and the “missing link” in their worldwide coverage. There are clear advantages for the UK’s leading firms: India’s legal code has roots in British law, its language of business is English and its economy has been growing by 8 per cent for the past three years.

Yet for now they are shut out. Strict Bar rules prevent large international law firms opening offices or practising Indian or foreign law in the country.

As well as raising the costs of Indian legal services for incoming multinationals, this creates other problems. Lesley Jackson, chief financial officer at United Breweries in Bangalore, says she must work with foreign law firms out of hotel rooms, shuttling back and forth to sign documents in Singapore, and having two law firms (one Indian and one foreign) on every deal. “It makes it difficult not to be able to instruct legal one-stop shops, especially on global deals where it is important to have a brand name,” she says.

Indian corporate lawyers with the right skills to serve such clients are also thin on the ground. Bharat Vasani, general counsel at Tata Group, says: “Outsiders can be deceived by the overall size of Indian law firms. There are actually very few partners capable of doing top level corporate work.”

The profession faces a struggle to service India’s growing corporate sector and foreign investors. According to India Today magazine, the country requires 3,000 new corporate lawyers a year to keep pace with demand. Multinationals such as IBM and Hewlett- Packard and Indian corporations such as Infosys and Reliance have responded by expanding their in-house legal departments. Promod Rao, general counsel of ICICI Bank, says: “Our referrals to domestic firms are few. We even parachute our own guys in to do due diligence work.”

For foreign law firms that need to serve their global clients in India, the Indian Bar restrictions create tortuous logistical challenges. Ashurst, a UK law firm, has a liaison office in Delhi but the firm’s visiting partners say they are careful not to meet clients or give legal advice at these premises, which are more akin to a personal apartment than a law firm office.

Sandeep Katwala, Linklaters’ India head, spends a lot of time working out of his “house hotel”, the Oberoi in Mumbai. Various other hotel suites double up as offices, not only for lawyers but for other professional firms such as Morgan Stanley and Nomura.

Linklaters is one of the most active law firms in India and has advised underwriters on some of India’s largest public listings, such as Cairn India’s IPO and that of DLF, India’s largest real estate company. Last year it formed a referral relationship with a recently established Mumbai law firm, Talwar Thakore & Associates.

Although independent, the firms refer work to each other, share training and run secondments. Kunal Thakore, whose father Shobhan is one of TTA’s named partners, is a partner in Linklaters’ Hong Kong office. Mr Katwala says: “We probably still work as much with other Indian law firms [as with TTA]. But on the Vodafone-Essar transaction, for example, working with TTA allowed us to offer the client an integrated team approach.”

To ensure they gain access to leading domestic lawyers, multinationals and foreign law firms have similar relationships with Indian law firms, such as Amarchand & Mangaldas and AZB & Partners. However, nearly everyone wants to instruct the top partners at these firms, so availability of talent is a problem. For example, during the demerger in 2005 of Reliance Industries, one of the country’s biggest conglomerates, Amarchand & Mangaldas acted for each of the Ambani brothers and their mother.

This type of arrangement would unsettle most western lawyers. “Conflicts in India are scary,” says Mukesh Bhavani, general counsel at Essar Group, the Indian conglomerate. He feels that although the Indian legal market is maturing, it still has some way to go before lawyers can claim to have put proper Chinese walls in place.

Foreign firms, meanwhile, are beating legal restrictions by developing India practices outside the country – and picking off the brightest graduates to staff them. Rajesh Begur, managing partner at ARA Law, a Mumbai-based firm, says he is already feeling the pinch of foreign competition in graduate recruitment. “I went to Jodphur just after [UK law firm] Herbert Smith had been there and I could not recruit one law student.”

The inroads made by foreign firms, however, can spark passionate opposition. Lalit Bhasin, head of the Society for Indian Lawyers, says: “UK Magic Circle firms want to emasculate the Indian legal profession in what amounts to a hostile takeover.”

Such sentiments contributed to the Indian Bar Council’s rejection of liberalisation proposals in November 2007. Firms believe it will be anything from three to five years before India opens up its legal market. For now, international law firms must look on with envy as the country’s local lawyers enjoy the rewards of exclusivity.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2008